Author: Larry Nocella

  • Boring People Don’t Exist — No One Is “Basic”

    Boring People Don’t Exist — No One Is “Basic”

    “You’re boring,” he said. The comment took me by surprise.

    It happened decades ago. I was an intern at a chemical lab. A coworker – an adult, I was still a teen — came into the lab and began working at a different station. We each were concentrating on our own tasks in silence for several minutes when suddenly he said, “You’re boring.”

    “What?” I answered. It felt like an insult, but I wasn’t sure. Plus, I wanted to buy time. How should I respond?

    “You never talk,” he said. “You don’t socialize. Boring.” Then he left.

    “But I have nothing to say at the moment,” I thought, not terribly hurt. I had never cared for him. Instincts validated.

    Still, the audacity stunned me. What kind of jerk tells someone they’re boring to their face? What kind of adult says that to a teenager?

    But I was new to the workplace, so I stayed quiet and observed. What counted as “not boring” for him was boring to me. When he socialized (as he called it) he complained about traffic, about the weather, about our job.

    His idea of “not boring” and “socializing” was whining about everyday stuff. Smaller than small talk, just casual complaints. I decided to play along. The next time we were both in the lab area, I said, “How about that traffic, huh? Terrible!”

    That led to an instantly forgettable exchange about the tiny annoyances of life. He never called me boring again.

    The Greatest Sin in American Society

    That was the only time in my entire life I was ever called boring. I have been loved, liked, disliked, even hated, but I’ve never been called normal. Or boring. One thing I’m not is boring.

    That may sound boastful, but that’s not the intent. Because I believe what I just said applies to you. And everyone. No one is boring. In the modern vernacular, the term is “basic.” No one is “basic.”

    Mediocre thinking goes like this: If your tastes and preferences are seen as unoriginal or just at the surface of any field, they are called “basic.” By extension, you too must be “basic.”

    Calling someone “basic” is also used as an insult, as in, “You’re not interesting. You’re boring.”

    You’re being accused of committing the greatest sin in American society: failure to entertain.

    But I don’t believe anyone is basic. I think everyone is interesting. They just don’t show it. For whatever reason, they often keep their most fascinating selves hidden. For fear of judgment, for privacy, whatever. There are dozens of reasons why people might hide their true nature, and probably a dozen more that are unique to them.

    An Error of Judgement

    The accusations sound like you did something wrong. In my case, I never liked the chemical lab guy because he was a small-talking blabbermouth. In keeping with my theme here, he may have been interesting in some way, but I never saw that side of him, and after he casually insulted me, I never cared to.

    The worst people are interesting, just not necessarily the people you want to get close to. Serial killers for example. Interesting, and definitely not basic or boring, but not admirable.

    What I couldn’t articulate at that time was this: People aren’t boring. They just don’t trust you yet, or ever.

    What I Could Have Said

    In retrospect, I laugh at this fool from my distant past.

    “I’m not here to entertain you.” I could have said. “And you’re not exactly a day at the carnival yourself, Mr. Small Talk.”

    Well, I could have said all that, but I didn’t want drama at my first real workplace. Maybe that’s why that fool considered people boring. He was clearly judging and others instinctively knew it. When people sense you’re judging them, they close up tighter.

    That’s your loss. Not theirs.

    A Whole New Weird, Wonderful World

    I once made these comments in a business meeting. Later, a colleague approached me and said, “You’re right. I really appreciated what you said about being fascinated by people’s secret lives. I have a secret I don’t tell anyone. I sell sex toys.” Then she gave me her business card.

    It was of no interest to me – honest! – but here was someone I knew nothing about. Yet when I expressed my admiration for people’s non-workplace persona, she knew she could trust me. And now I’m a regular customer… KIDDING.

    The world and the creatures in it are full of wonder and secrets. If you just think people are boring, they’re not going to correct you. If you demand they dance for you, they’re going to freeze up. Earn their trust with genuine curiosity and the world gets even more interesting.

  • How To Use Generative AI to be More Human

    How To Use Generative AI to be More Human

    Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

    Early in my writing career, I had a debate with an editor after I told him my strategy to avoid clichés. It’s a simple trick: If I’ve heard the phrase before, I take it out. He considered the idea then rendered his judgment. 

    “I agree mostly,” he said. “But I don’t think you should limit yourself.”

    We left it at that. Decades ago. I’ve since come over to his view a little. Sometimes a cliché is the right move. When someone is grieving the death of a loved one, the standard, “I’m sorry for your loss” is a fine move. That’s not the time to get creative and display your vocabulary wizardry.

    I concede, editor-whose-name-I-forgot. Clichés have their place. That place is when creativity is irrelevant and maybe even harmful.

    Most of the time, clichés should be avoided like … the plague …. no… like a truck with a Confederate flag sticker. Instead of a metaphor that’s been used since before … you were born… no… since stone met tablet, make a new one. Like I did here, twice.

    Instead of “as fast as lightning” come up with something. Like “as fast as a day off.”

    Not great, not genius, but they’re new and make the same point.

    Why prioritize newness? Because it’s called creative writing for a reason. Plus, you never know what will catch on.

    I once wrote that a certain future event was “as inevitable as the sunset.” Imagine my delight when I heard it used in a news broadcast. Had they seen my writing, or was it independent invention? Who knows?

    What does this have to do with generative AI?

    Because I found a new way to use AI and autocomplete and auto-suggest. I refer to those ghostly phrases that appear in computer apps to guess what you’re typing. They are fine and helpful for completing words. But I despise them when they suggest phrases or entire sentences. Because they’re making the suggestion based on what is most commonly used.

    For a quick refresher, the generative AI mechanism is very simple. It chooses the word most likely to come next. (1)

    To paraphrase author William Deresiewicz, AI makes a high-probability choice, human creativity is a low-probability risky choice. Sometimes it fails but sometimes hits big.(2)

    In other words, AI lacks the risk factor. AI lacks the go-for-it, come-what-may, devil-may-care (clichés) energy. It lacks that, I’m-mortal-but-not-dead-yet boldness (new) that we humans can hurl forth.

    For those of you worried about AI taking your creativity, it won’t – as long as you’re bolder than it. But how do we know what AI is “thinking?” Easy. It tells us.

    When you’re creative writing, leave the auto-phrase or auto-sentence complete feature on. When the app suggests a phrase, you know what to avoid.

    That’s a tiny alert notification that it’s time to be bold – go for it – make something up. So instead of same old, “The runner was as fast as lightning.” you might come up with …

    • The runner was as fast as me changing the channel when ice skating comes on.
    • The runner was as fast as a lie on social media.
    • The runner was as fast as credit card debt at the casino.
    • The runner was as fast as a weekend with no chores.

    So there you go. I made up those examples above. Right now on the spot, no editing or second chances. I wanted to show you a live example. None of them great, but they are – as far as I know – new and unique, also known as creative.

    Because of their newness they are not in any generative AI language models. Because of their uniqueness, they are unlikely to be suggested in future language models that scrape this essay. And should they ever return in ghostly auto-complete form, I’ll ignore them anyway and make up something new. Just as I promised that editor from the past.

    Is AI going to replace creativity? Only if we let it by being uncreative. If we use it as a sidekick, it can help us by telling us exactly what NOT to do. 

    Sources:

    1. What is Chat GPT Doing and Why Does it Work? by Stephen Wolfram 2023
    2. William Deresiewicz on The Unspeakable Podcast episode: “Is Art Boring Or Is It Just Us? William Deresiewicz Returns To The Pod” June 12, 2023

  • Blog Rewind: Is it okay to cheer or laugh that someone died? Or, are The Darwin Awards funny?

    Blog Rewind: Is it okay to cheer or laugh that someone died? Or, are The Darwin Awards funny?

    Here’s a bit of philosophy from 28 January 2008. It’s a blog titled, in a most un-SEO-friendly way: “When is it okay to cheer or laugh that someone died? Or, are The Darwin Awards funny?” This first question re-appeared recently, following footage of stalwart opponent of the working class, Senator Mitch McConnell, freezing mid-sentence at a press conference. The questions arose again. Is it okay to wish someone dead? What if that person is a known oppressor?


    So, I ask you, when is it okay to cheer or laugh that someone is dead or has died? Is it ever okay?

    The question occurred to me while browsing the internet. Death-wishing is a tradition that spans the spectrum of political belief. A convenient way to eliminate someone annoying is to have death come calling, a liability-free assassination, if you will.

    Regardless of my politics, the act of death-wishing makes me nervous. When I hear that someone has died, I don’t consider it an opportunity to make a joke. Especially if they are some kind of entertainer and nothing more.

    Test of Righteousness

    Now that I’m riding my high horse, let’s test it: what if a terrible person died? What if a sponsor of mass murder like George W. Bush died? Would that be something worth cheering or mocking?

    That’s a tough question for me. Let’s review facts. George W. Bush caused the occupation of Iraq. All the death, sorrow and suffering that follows — and is ongoing — is due to in large part to him. Could his passing be a good thing?

    Maybe. Even so, it’s not something I would cheer about. It’s too sobering. The guy led the destruction of an entire nation, got lots of Americans and Iraqis killed.

    At such a time, it might be time it’s time to breathe easier. It’s a hope that one death might put an end to the war or speed its end. Still, I’m left wondering: how did we get here? How did things get so bad that a clown like George W. Bush became president and caused all this destruction? How did it come to pass that I would feel relief that someone died?

    It all reminds me of a guy I once heard interviewed who watched the execution of his daughter’s killer. Did it make him feel better? “I thought it would,” he said, “But I still feel awful. Nothing is going to bring her back. Nothing is going to make me feel better.”

    Still, we’re talking about nasty people dying. That’s a gray area.

    A time when it is without question immoral to wish another’s death is when the deceased is just an entertainer or someone non-famous.

    Death as Entertainment?

    Which brings me to the Darwin Awards. They’re “awards” given out to people who die because of their stupid actions. The idea that their death helps the gene pool. I’ve never been a fan of the Darwin Awards. Stupid as the award-winners may be, they had loved ones who grieve their absence. That’s not fodder for a chuckle.

    Some may think I’m being uptight, but I’ll parry and counter that. The Darwin Awards are for lame-asses who think they’re superior. Every great story in your life involves you as a potential contender for a Darwin Award. If you haven’t done something crazy and reckless, then you haven’t lived!

    Any “I was so drunk and/or stoned” story is only improved if it involves a brush with death. It’s a great story if it comes terrifyingly close to making you a Darwin Award winner.

    Then it’s something to share the next time you’re drunk and/or stoned. Cheating death makes a good story.

    When death wins, that’s another day at the office, and who wants to laugh at that?


    Rewind Review

    My opinion hasn’t changed much here, but it has become more articulate. We’re not evil for hoping someone dies or falls ill – if our goal is simply to get them to stop hurting us. If we’re wishing death on someone for no reason, that’s psychotic. If we’re wishing death on them because we don’t like their opinions then maybe we don’t like freedom as much as we claim to.

    But in the case of Senator Mitch McConnell and his recent health scare, we are reacting to his repeated, conscious, chosen actions over a decades-long career of making life harder for most Americans. The one most recently sticks out in my mind is when he dithered on paltry subsistence payments to the American people at the height of COVID lock-down.

    Summarized: I don’t want to wish ill on anyone, but I also wish they’d stop being dicks.

    We ill-wishers are desperately seeking a way for the pain McConnell causes to stop. I fear our mistake is blaming an individual and not a system. We incorrectly think if he were to leave the Senate, that Congress might stop being useless. That’s probably wrong. Another morality-free scumbag would replace him.

    I don’t claim to know what the fix for Congress is, but I do claim to know the obvious: they are not serving the American people. They are serving the rich. Until there is a fix, I do hope the immoral clowns running it step down. How that happens I leave to fate.

    Photo by Lina White on Unsplash

  • Blog Rewind: Hustle Culture before there was Hustle Culture

    Blog Rewind: Hustle Culture before there was Hustle Culture

    I’m Done Reading Get-Rich-Quick “I Made X Dollars Writing About Y” Articles

    Blog Rewind: This one was published a while back in 2022, when I got sick of these types of articles. Nothing has changed except I’m no longer disappointed because I avoid them.

    Before the internet, before “hustle culture,” there were print and classified ads. These ads were a mix of anything. Some read simply, “Send me a dollar and I’ll tell you how to make $100.”

    When you sent in your dollar, the reply you got — the secret to making money — was to repeat the process. Do what the person who placed the ad did. The advice? “Put an ad in the classifieds that reads, ‘Send me a dollar and I’ll tell you how to make $100.’”

    Cute, right? Very neat, very circular.

    Now, let’s come back to the present. If that trick sounds familiar, it’s because a lot — and I mean A LOT — of hustle culture articles remind me of that.

    I guarantee you’ve seen them. Like me, you probably clicked a few. These blog posts hint that you too can make money writing for the internet. If you just write articles about writing on the internet.

    I don’t have a problem with people wringing every last penny out of SEO trickery. If a website is going to be lazy and pay people to write the same old stuff, fine. Maybe they’ll even have AI compose the article for you. It can’t be hard for predictive text to assemble marketing articles that tell you how to write marketing articles. Fine, make that cash. Exploit that algorithm. Work the system.

    Just don’t expect me to read it. Ever again. That’s why I’m done.

    Here forward if an article’s title is something like “I Made X Dollars Doing Y” or “I Made X Dollars Writing for Website Z and You Can Too” or some variation, I’m avoiding it. Maybe I’ll block the person sharing it, maybe I’ll even avoid the site it’s on.

    Just for kicks I went on a bender and read dozens of hustle culture articles. I can’t remember one that gave me an insight beyond, “Write a lot and publish a lot. When you have between one hundred and one thousand articles, you’ll make money.”

    It’s likely true. If you have one thousand articles, and they each pay a penny a day just from random clicks, that’s $10 a day. Ten bucks a day for a month is not bad at all. Again, if that’s your gig, do it.

    I would advise everyone I know not to bother reading it, but hey, you do you.

    Now that we’ve come to the end of this rant, I regret to say I sound a bit like those annoying social media posts where people make a point to announce they are un-following an account or leaving a group.

    As if their absence (or in this case, mine) will be cause for alarm. Let me say I realize it’s not. I’m just sharing why I dislike internet filler.

    And I will be careful not to let the door hit my ass on the way out. Thank you.

  • How to Be Happier

    How to Be Happier

    Was working some things out in my head about #gratitude and #happiness and put this together. Think of it as a micro-mini #tedtalk about #mentalhealth It helped me maybe it will help you. Stay happy, friends!

    @scooter_bae

    Was working some things out in my head about #gratitude and #happiness and put this together. Think of it as a micro-mini #tedtalk about #mentalhealth It helped me maybe it will help you. Stay happy, friends!

    ♬ Lofibeats chillhop(943906) – Enokido
  • Book Review: Dead in the Water

    Book Review: Dead in the Water

    Just read the fascinating non-fiction book Dead in the Water. Part true crime, part behind the scenes how the world works. Review as my TikTok persona, @scooter_bae! Amazon affiliate link here https://amzn.to/3O5wisQ

    @scooter_bae Just read a fascinating interesting book Dead in the Water. Part true crime, part bts how the world works. Amazon affiliate link here https://amzn.to/3O5wisQ #booktok #bookrecommendations #bookrecs #bookreview #nonfiction ♬ Cinematic Music – dN. Chandrawinata