Category: Philosophy

  • Riddle of the Falling Tree -SOLVED!

    Riddle of the Falling Tree -SOLVED!

    It’s a popular riddle: If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it still make a sound?

    The answer is obvious! The answer is No. The tree crashes to the ground completely silent. If you are not personally there to witness an event, obviously — quite obviously — it doesn’t happen.

    This is why when you meet a young child, they will be the same age, even if you meet them years later. That four-year-old distant relative who wants to be a fireman? When you see him again ten years later, take notice that he’s still four. He only ages in your presence.

    Haven’t you ever wondered why all trees outside of your perception stay the same height and size?

    If you travel to a nation you have never been to before, take notice how they are still using stone age tech. Once you are present to witness them, they will breathe a sigh of relief, mobbing you like a messiah. I bet you always wondered why they begged you to stay. “We want to progress beyond smoke signals now and use cellphones. Finally! Stay! Oh, please stay.”

    Further, did you know that if you simply close your eyes, everyone stops moving? They start again only when you open your eyes. This is also a good way to silence people you don’t want to hear from. Our world is amazing.

    If you’re not there with your high-vis vest, hard hat and checklist, then nothing is going to happen. When you sleep, absolutely nothing happens. The universe is like a lazy worker. It doesn’t do anything unless the boss is present. Otherwise, it’s frozen still.

    If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it still make a sound? Why is this even a question? Of course it doesn’t make a sound. You are the center of the universe and nothing happens without you. Riddle solved.

    Now go take a selfie.

    Image generated by Google Gemini AI and tweaked with some photo editing fun.

    If you liked this clever smart-assery and simply must have more fun like it, then get your sexy self over to LarryNocella.com or better yet, try out the latest book: One Odd Cat, available on Amazon (affiliate link.)

  • How to Use Words with Maximum Impact

    How to Use Words with Maximum Impact

    Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

    Word Police on Patrol

    There’s this interesting video where a girl asks why we call something “man-made” (here) when women were also a part of its construction.

    Many explode with rage over the suggestion that we alter or update our language. I’m not one of them. People who rage at the idea that we use a new word are annoying.

    Equally irritating are those who attack anyone who fails to use the most modern terms. The rules of vocabulary are ever-shifting and agreed-upon by unofficial consensus of … who knows?

    I don’t agree with either extreme. Language is an art and is always inexact. It’s clumsy and messy. Rarely does someone use it with laser-like precision. Rarer still, does someone use with adherence to the human rights and history, etc. One could argue that any popular language is by default the tongue of a conqueror.

    Then there’s context. Context is king. Who is speaking? To whom? Where? What’s the goal? Speed? Accuracy? The environment? Formal? Casual? So many variables come into play.

    Context is the Forest, Words are the Trees

    I experienced the power of context during a recent trip to Mexico, where I attempted to speak Spanish. I use an app to practice. It’s challenging and fun, but a little impractical. I like to joke that if I’m ever in Mexico and someone asks me ‘Is the cat sitting on the table?’ I’m all set.

    Haha, right? But when I was in Mexico, my abilities were far better than I expected. I think I owe that sudden boost to context. When you’re in a hallway and you must step around someone, you need a simple phrase. Even if you botch it, they know you mean, “excuse me.” If you’re in an airport or a hotel or a restaurant and you approach a clerk, chances are you’re asking how to find the toilet.

    Yes, I’m a wordsmith (sounds cooler than ‘writer.’) But I don’t agree that words should be policed with the zealotry they often are. Communication is sloppy and imperfect. That’s also part of the fun. That looseness allows for creativity. Verbal jazz, baby. Word artistry, dig?

    The Mysterious Case of the Appreciated Films

    Back to the girl who complained about the term “man-made.” I agree with her. It’s a lousy term. Not a crime, but not great. Some roll their eyes at word-changing suggestions. I don’t. It’s better to consider the argument. So please, travel with me along my thought-path as we assess our friend’s suggestion that we ditch “man-made.”

    As a man, it’s easy for me to retort, “In that context, when we say ‘man-made’ we mean human-made.” I could stop there, but let’s fire up some empathy. Such an open-n-shut judgment is easy for me to say — since I happen to fall into the group. But it seems to have irked the girl — and I know it irks women of all ages.

    It reminds me of when the original Black Panther and Wonder Woman films came out. The first ones were above-average flicks. But people were reacting positively to them far and above enjoying a great movie. They were ecstatic. Many explained how wonderful it was to finally see someone who looked like them as the hero.

    I’m ashamed to admit I was a little confused by that. I thought, what’s the big deal? Superheroes embrace universal values. Then again, for a long time, most comic book and movie heroes appear as males of European ancestry like me. I never thought of it until I saw others’ reactions.

    Taking Representation for Granted

    I had been taking my representation for granted. I never knew it was something one could desire because I never felt its absence. Well, I know now. Representation matters — and if it matters to you, it matters to me.

    Some efforts to change language seem lazy, an attack on the easy part of a genuine problem. But sometimes it’s as simple as an inconsequential switch with a big payoff. I’m not going to fight to the death to use the term “man-made.” “Artificial” works as well and doesn’t alienate half of our species.

    But then, I won’t hate someone if they use an antiquated word. Words don’t matter as much as intent. Clinging to an inexact word is not something I care to do, but being able to express an idea with maximum force?

    Now, that is what I’m passionate about.

    Image by Bing Copilot AI. Prompt: create an image of a smooth cool jazz trumpet player along on a stage in a spotlight in a dark nightclub. There is a stream of letters coming out of his trumpet

  • The Words I Wish I Had Said More

    The Words I Wish I Had Said More

    Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

    Personal Branding: An Annoying Exercise

    “What music do you like?” I asked a fellow cube-jockey. I asked this innocent question not so long ago, in the endless cubicles of The Corporation. Her response was strange.

    She bowed her head, shy about her answer. “Justin Beiber,” she mumbled. She even winced a little, expecting me to mock her. Lucky for her, that’s not my style. Even luckier, I had recently articulated my chilled-out approach during a corporate training.

    We had been challenged to design our “personal brand.” Usually when I hear such an assignment, I want to vomit. Cramming yourself into a “brand” is a ceremony enforced by the religion of Capitalism. I put it in the same annoying category as people’s tendency to generalize by generation. Both are rituals for the benefit of easier marketing.

    Anyway, back to my pal. I announced to her, “Hey, my brand is ‘No Judgment.’ You like what you like.” She seemed grateful. I felt proud for making her feel comfortable enough to be honest. Done right, I guess personal branding could be a good thing.

    No Judgment Done Right

    So yeah, that’s my personal brand: No Judgment. Obviously, it’s not something to take to extremes. I mean no judgment where judgment isn’t necessary. If someone tries to stab you, it’s okay to get a little judgey toward them.

    But for preferences in entertainment, and fashion choices? That’s where no judgment comes in. There’s a lot of critics out there. I’m sure you’ve noticed. They always have something to say about your looks, clothes, music, tastes, whatever.

    My favorite species of this creature are the men who try to be judges of straight, strong, manliness. These guys are the ones who say “Real men don’t wear X. Real men don’t do Y.” etc. I always find those dudes homoerotic. Like, why, are you claiming to be super-straight and yet you are so preoccupied with how other men look? Nothing wrong with being gay, of course. But it’s weird to craft a persona – a brand, if you will – posturing as ultra-straight, while judging other men’s looks.

    I’m a straight man, and I like Broadway musicals. I’m a straight man (am I trying to convince myself?) and I love the energy of Pride Month dance music. I’m a straight man (I swear!) and I wear crocs. I don’t give a crap what anyone says about it. I like what I like.

    “Not My Cup of Tea”

    I wasn’t always so wise, unfortunately. Legend says my friends and I went to see the movie A FEW GOOD MEN in the theater back in 1992. I hated it. HAY-TED-IT. I was so enraged that MORE THAN ONE of my friends recalls how uptight I was after the film. Note that as of this writing, it’s over 30 years ago. They still remember.

    I am retro-ashamed of myself. If I only I had developed my “No Judgment” brand then. Why did I stew so much that I burned my pointless fury into the memory of people I loved? Why didn’t I say, “Meh. It wasn’t my cup of tea,” and let others enjoy what they enjoyed?

    “Not my cup of tea.”

    That’s my favorite way to express non-judgment. If someone forces the issue, say “Not my cup of tea.” Best part is you can still appreciate the skill of the work in question. For example, don’t dig Metallica or Taylor Swift music. It’s not my cup of tea. But I can definitely appreciate the fan bases they’ve built.

    You could also stay silent. That’s the hardest part: accepting that somehow the world will carry on. Even if everyone remains ignorant of your every opinion.

    Image by Bing Copilot AI. Prompt: create an image of a cartoon judge refusing a cup of tea

  • The “No Life Advantage” of a Comment Commando

    The “No Life Advantage” of a Comment Commando

    Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

    Hiding from Our Beautiful World

    I was on a cruise in the Caribbean, enjoying a vacation many can only dream of. The sun was high, the sky so clear and blue it almost hurt to see. Sparkles dotted the ocean out to the horizon.

    It was one of those vistas so breathtaking, that I gave myself a reminder, almost a prayer. “This is why you work hard. This is what you struggle for, for moments of beauty like this.”

    At least, that’s what I had said earlier. After, I withdrew to our cabin and pulled the curtain closed like some sort of eccentric zillionaire hiding from the world. In the dark, I stared at my cell phone. I had connected to the cruise ship’s spotty (and expensive) internet, so I could login to social media and argue with a moron. We were trading insults about an election that had just passed.

    Fortunately, the scene outside was too gorgeous to ignore. My internal voice spoke up again, no longer reverent but furious.

    “What the hell are you doing?!?!” it yelled. Somehow it got through. I looked up from my phone. What the hell was I doing?

    That was the beginning of the end of my days as a Comment Commando.

    Enlisting in the Comment Commando Corps

    It all began in 2016, when dictator-wannabes rose to power in the USA. They’re still here in 2024, being awful and making life miserable for everyone else.

    Back in 2016, I began reading books about survivors of dictatorial regimes. I sought guidance. What did the average citizen do to resist the rise of cruelty? Could it be stopped?

    The main lesson I found was this: be visible. The human animal looks around for cues on how to act. If we see cruelty, we tolerate it more, ignore it, or worse, participate. If we see kindness, that too, is contagious.

    The advice I kept encountering was simple: remain visible in appearance, habit, and speech. In as many ways as you can, advocate for a society of freedom. Don’t just vote. Be visible.

    It’s not a new concept, but one I felt I could do better than I had been doing.

    So we put up a sign outside our home where it remains to this day. It’s one of those with no allegiance to a party or candidate but rather to principles. As in, “In this house we believe in science, in kindness, that all people are equal, that love is love, etc.” A sticker from gay-rights group HRC went on the back of the car.

    I don’t think these actions are going to save the world. Nothing will “save the world” as long as we have free will. But it was what the experts had said to do. I wanted to do more.

    Where could I be more visible? The internet, of course. I’m a computer guy, I like the challenge of writing and articulating thoughts, and I’m decent with insult zingers. So I metaphorically parachuted into the badlands of Twitter and Facebook, seeking to become the terror of bigots and bullies everywhere. 

    Everyone Off the Bench

    Now some might think I’ve screwed up this article by mentioning politics. “Ew, yucky!” is a summary of most common reactions. I’ve never understood that. If you don’t get involved in politics, it will get involved in you. Quite literally.

    There’s a million ways you can dissect why bad behavior seems to be on the rise, but I distill it down to this: people don’t participate enough in politics. They consider it boring and tedious. They’re partly right. It’s often designed that way to discourage people from paying attention. But participation is necessary. Just like taking out the trash and unclogging the toilet, politics may be unpleasant, but tending to the task is required and ignoring it brings disaster.

    Right now, we need everyone off the bench. Everyone has to get involved in politics. The bad guys have been working diligently to reduce our freedom for decades.

    Now they are in positions of power and using our sense of fairness against us. For example, we respect who wins the election and let them make the decisions. That grace is not returned. They don’t respect anyone else’s electoral win but their own.

    Note the differences in reaction between the presidential elections of 2016 and 2020. In 2016, the free will of the people was accepted by the losing parties. In 2020, the free will of the people has been attacked relentlessly even to this day, despite a complete lack of evidence.

    Lar’s Law of Politics and Internet Arguments, a.k.a. The “No Life Advantage“ Principle

    I don’t want to blame the average American for failure to participate. It’s not entirely our fault that we’re sliding into fascism or religious dictatorship or corporate takeover or whatever rancid dystopia-flavored smoothie results from those three heinous ideas mixed together.

    The system is already against us. We’re worked nearly to death and by the time we’re done all the annoying administrative duties of survival, we’re exhausted. We want to relax and so we ignore politics. Just how the bad guys want it.

    Exacerbating that is the “no life advantage” principle. The what? I’ll elaborate, but basically, in some fields, people who have “no life” have a built-in advantage.  

    Let’s start with you and I: we have family we love, we have hobbies, we have things we want to do, parts of life we want to experience. When we’re not pressured by work, we don’t want to get involved in politics because it’s tedious. We have a life.

    Contrast that with religious extremists, bigots, and other bad actors. As we say in the vernacular, “They have no life.” They are miserable and rather than do something to improve themselves and fix their misery, they oppress others. Religious extremists (not all people with religious belief, but extremists) are even worse. The myth of a paradise-like afterlife is a weapon the bad guys exploit: “Yes, this political work is dull, but don’t worry about it. You’ll have fun in the next life.”

    The “No Life Advantage” Principle has at least two implications:

    • In politics, those with “no life” have an advantage because they will be persistent beyond anything a person who has something fun to do can match.
    • In internet arguments, the person who has “no life” most often wins because they reply and reply until the other party goes off to do something else. The no-lifer gets the final say.

    We good guys, we live-and-let-live types, those of us with lives, have an advantage too: there are far more of us. The problem is that not enough of us are involved. We need you NOW. Everyone off the bench! If we all do a little, we win, because we so vastly outnumber the jerks. Get visible!

    With one small caveat: don’t burn out.

    Being Visible in a Way You Can Sustain

    Hold on a sec, if I’m so pro-participation, why is this article titled “Confessions” like I’m against it? Well, there’s a balance to be maintained. Participate, but don’t overdo it like I did. I’ve adjusted my Comment Commando strategy. I’ve learned to balance it with life.

    You’ve heard of “work life balance?” How about “participate-in-democracy life balance?”

    On that cruise ship, as I neglected that gorgeous view, I realized I needed to re-calibrate, or I was going to flame out and become another non-participator. You occasionally have to enjoy what you’re fighting for. And by fighting, I mean word-slappin’ user ChristAndGunLover2A with a perfect insult about his ancestry.

    Back then, I was pleased with my visibility but concerned with the time I was spending. More than that, I felt I was being manipulated by social media. It’s now common knowledge those apps serve up extreme content to keep you engaged. Was my attempt at allyship serving as support for the marginalized or more to boost a platform’s daily user metric? Was I being visible, or was I …

    • Brawling with trolls from a foreign nation bent on sowing animosity in the USA?
    • Battling with humans paid to push an agenda, to portray unpopular ideas as popular?
    • Arguing with pranksters who try to see how much they can irritate others?
    • Debating with actual extremists and/or actual idiots, neither set ever changing their minds?
    • Talking to bots from the platform itself so they can prove high “engagement” to advertisers?

    I still use social media to be visible but I’m more careful about my time there. I now have a two-comment rule. I may leave a comment if I feel the need (or urge.) If someone replies, I am allowed one counter-reply. Then I’m done.

    The sign in front of my house that marks us as visible advocates for freedom? That stays. The stickers, the flags, that all stays.

    As for visibility, it’s there now, but more a habit, and I’m always looking for new ways to do it in a more meaningful way. I hope you do too. If not, well… remember what I said about ignoring the clogged toilet.

    Imagine that on a nationwide scale. Let’s not find out what that’s like. Participate now, please. And get visible! Thank you!