Tag: politics

  • When Losing 98.5% of the Time is Winning!

    When Losing 98.5% of the Time is Winning!

    I spent a lot of time online countering the lie that the 2020 Election was fraudulent. It only took one link. Am I going to have to do it all again?

    As I finish this (2026 July 15) — the president is scheduled to give a speech to the nation tomorrow. Rumors say its going to be about the lie that the 2020 election was fraudulent. So for once, my writing about a topic is well-timed.

    The King of Troll-Slayers Retires

    I’ve written about how I consider myself a social media commando. Full story here. The short version is that I used to prowl social media in the service of visibility. Wherever a bigot would spout cruelty, I would be visible in my defiance. As many freedom fighters advise: being visible is key to fighting evil.

    I still think that’s a worthy cause, and I am thankful for those who pursue it, but I’ve burned out on most social media. I desire to have a quiet mind. When you are endlessly taking in others’ expressions, you have no space to make your own. With the rise of automated content creation, social media has become a chaotic bore-fest. It’s all ads, AI slopaganda, dance videos, and dudes getting banged in the nuts.

    Despite my desire to be visible in defending the vulnerable, I’ve bailed on the socials. For fun we can call it PTSD: Post Troll-Slaying Disorder. I thought I could make a positive difference countering stupid talking points. But at this point, it’s unclear if the accounts making those dumb points are even real.

    I’ve retired. At least, I thought I had.

    My Favorite Link Weapon

    During my time in online comment battlefields, I collected a reference library of links. These led to articles by reputable sources that destroyed the talking points broadcast from Jerk HQ. The link I used most is probably going to get another workout after this upcoming speech. Here it is: By the numbers: President Donald Trump’s failed efforts to overturn the election (USA Today).

    Team Trump filed 62 lawsuits intended to prove the 2020 Election was fraudulent. They lost 61 times. In sports terms, their record was 1 and 61. Abysmal. You would probably have more success trying to prove in court that up is actually, in fact, down.

    Every time I encountered some idiotic comment that the election was stolen, I sent them that link. How do you lose that badly? If you have no evidence. But if you’ve got the proof and the courts won’t accept it, why not make your proof public? The answer is obvious: because you don’t have any. (Though whatever they’ve manufactured may be rolling out after this mystery speech.)

    Pushing a Turd Uphill

    The funny part of this is that eventually, I came across an article from one of the sources of dumb talking points: The Brookings “Institute.” This article here explains how actually, if you think about it really hard, losing 61 of 62 court cases is a rather good record. Check out this hilarious garbage here. Trump’s judicial campaign to upend the 2020 election: A failure, but not a wipe-out (Brookings.edu)

    A one and sixty-one record is quite good — according to the Brookings Institute. Keep pushing that turd uphill, losers.

    I used the “Trump lost 61 of 62 court cases” point so much online, I like to think that I played a small part in pressuring the Brookings Institute to issue their insipid counterpoint. But who knows?

    Abuser Behavior

    Before the Trump squad elevated crybabyism and the self-victimization of abusers worldwide, people would lament the fact that most Americans never bothered to vote.

    But playing the victim is a common abusive-personality tactic. Suddenly in 2020, not only were people voting, but they were voting obsessively. Illegally. Like never before! All to hurt poor wee president man-baby.

    What chars my asscheeks most about election lies is that average everyday Americans work hard to help people vote. In 2020, I was one of them. So to anyone out there left who is still falling for this lie, I ask – not that you care but to note it – do you realize you’re insulting your neighbors who volunteer to help YOU?

    But then, if awareness and genuine concern were their values, we wouldn’t be here. See you at the speech Thursday (well after for the recaps, I never watch idiots blather live.) And let’s not forget about those pesky Epstein files.

    Photo by Shawn Rain on Unsplash

  • Can Facts Be Hate Speech?

    Can Facts Be Hate Speech?

    CENSORED! 2 HOT 4 LINKEDIN!

    A notification from LinkedIn delivered the news: “Your comment has been removed because we define it as hate speech.”

    I couldn’t believe it. Me? Hate speech? But I try to love everyone!

    Sure, I’ve been known to unleash creative foul-mouthery online, but as one might say on Linkedin, IT’S MY BRAND. Even so, on that site, I’m connected to colleagues, and I restrain my verbal savagery while liberally sprinkling the disclaimer that my opinion is mine alone and not representative of anyone else.

    I reviewed the events that led to my comment removal. Someone made a post comparing Trump to Hitler. Another person said that was inappropriate. I countered that it was acceptable, writing this:

    It is 100% appropriate and correct to call Trump a Nazi. He is borrowing the Hitler playbook 100%. Hitler and Nazis didn’t wake up one morning and 6 million people were dead. They did it gradually just like Trump is doing. Your credibility suffers greatly because you don’t accept the facts. Calling people illegals, then putting them in camps, then blaming them for their suffering (they shouldn’t have come here.) It’s all gradual and only fools don’t see it. Please wake up.

    That doesn’t sound like hate speech to me. Oh well. I could move on, but I think there is an important thought here, far beyond the tradition of selling comment blockage as evidence that the powerful fear my truth. I’m not sure 2 HOT 4 LinkedIn carries the same rizz, but it’s all I’ve got. Let’s discuss.

    RADICALLY HONEST SELF-REFLECTION

    It was time to reflect.  It’s always the people who insist they aren’t hateful who are the most hateful. If they would just reflect, I often cry, thinking, perhaps naively, that if they really thought about it, hateful people would realize how hateful they are.

    Rather than take the usual route of spinning my comment’s removal into yet another entry in the sad genre of the Cancel Culture Complainers Club, I decided to honestly consider the situation.

    The truth is, yes, I hate Trump. In the same way I hate all malicious idiots in power. The same way I shake my head at all the wasted potential of anyone who uses their gifts for greed and cruelty.

    I don’t feel my comment was “hate speech” in either the term’s common usage (ranting and insulting) or its more legal-ish definition: encouraging prejudice. I didn’t follow up with any threats of violence. I just strongly suggested Trump be removed from any decision-making beyond his next greasy meal, because he’s doing all the same things Hitler did. Those are facts.

    EXPLAINING TO INTERNET CLOWNS HOW TIME WORKS

    In typical Internet brick-brained ness, a common complaint one sees from assorted bots, trolls, and morons is that Trump isn’t Hitler because Hitler killed 6 million people. Trump hasn’t.

    True, but what that short-sighted argument doesn’t account for is time. Events in life happen over time. Obviously sensible people like you know that, but we have to often remind the dense denizens of the internet how basic reality works.

    Hitler didn’t emerge from the womb and instantly become the world’s most adorable little concentration camp builder. It took time. So, yes, fine. Trump is not exactly Hitler, but he sure is Hitler-shaped. Check out his Hitler-ish resume:

    Establishing a Secret police force. Censorship of critics. Open racism. Hounding political enemies. A clear belief of racial superiority. Starting pointless wars. Bullying and imprisoning minorities. Exploiting a Corrupt Establishment and Fake Opposition party (a.k.a. The mainstream Democratic Party and its leadership: Schumer, Pelosi, Jeffries, etc.)

    If Trump could be Hitler, he surely would. He has often expressed his boy crushes on dictators across the world.

    A similar time-ignorant meme swept through troll nation following the No Kings protests. “If Trump was a king, he wouldn’t allow protests!”

    No kidding! But becoming a king in a democracy takes time. No, Trump is not Hitler, and no, he’s not a King, but it’s NOT FOR LACK OF TRYING.

    EXACLTY WHEN AM I ALLOWED TO SAY IT?

    To the LinkedIn moderation team (or their keyword-hunting A.I.), as well as the bots, trolls, morons, and brick-brained, I ask you: Exactly when along the timeline between banally evil obnoxious jerk (where Trump is now) and Hitler (where Trump is heading) am I allowed to call him someone Hitler-ish without getting censored? 

    Do I have to wait until the concentration camps multiply? The secret police force expands? All our rights are gone? Or am I allowed to point out the indisputable similarities now?

    This whole “Trump can’t be Hitler because he isn’t Hitler yet!” meme is defeated by the old cliché, “A stitch in time saves nine.”

    When along the progress of a fire should you shout fire? When it starts at the oven? Or do I have to wait until the whole first floor is engulfed before I sound the alarm?

    This isn’t about me and one blocked comment, it’s about what can and can’t be said. The facts are obvious. We should be allowed to say them.

  • The “No Life Advantage” of a Comment Commando

    The “No Life Advantage” of a Comment Commando

    Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

    Hiding from Our Beautiful World

    I was on a cruise in the Caribbean, enjoying a vacation many can only dream of. The sun was high, the sky so clear and blue it almost hurt to see. Sparkles dotted the ocean out to the horizon.

    It was one of those vistas so breathtaking, that I gave myself a reminder, almost a prayer. “This is why you work hard. This is what you struggle for, for moments of beauty like this.”

    At least, that’s what I had said earlier. After, I withdrew to our cabin and pulled the curtain closed like some sort of eccentric zillionaire hiding from the world. In the dark, I stared at my cell phone. I had connected to the cruise ship’s spotty (and expensive) internet, so I could login to social media and argue with a moron. We were trading insults about an election that had just passed.

    Fortunately, the scene outside was too gorgeous to ignore. My internal voice spoke up again, no longer reverent but furious.

    “What the hell are you doing?!?!” it yelled. Somehow it got through. I looked up from my phone. What the hell was I doing?

    That was the beginning of the end of my days as a Comment Commando.

    Enlisting in the Comment Commando Corps

    It all began in 2016, when dictator-wannabes rose to power in the USA. They’re still here in 2024, being awful and making life miserable for everyone else.

    Back in 2016, I began reading books about survivors of dictatorial regimes. I sought guidance. What did the average citizen do to resist the rise of cruelty? Could it be stopped?

    The main lesson I found was this: be visible. The human animal looks around for cues on how to act. If we see cruelty, we tolerate it more, ignore it, or worse, participate. If we see kindness, that too, is contagious.

    The advice I kept encountering was simple: remain visible in appearance, habit, and speech. In as many ways as you can, advocate for a society of freedom. Don’t just vote. Be visible.

    It’s not a new concept, but one I felt I could do better than I had been doing.

    So we put up a sign outside our home where it remains to this day. It’s one of those with no allegiance to a party or candidate but rather to principles. As in, “In this house we believe in science, in kindness, that all people are equal, that love is love, etc.” A sticker from gay-rights group HRC went on the back of the car.

    I don’t think these actions are going to save the world. Nothing will “save the world” as long as we have free will. But it was what the experts had said to do. I wanted to do more.

    Where could I be more visible? The internet, of course. I’m a computer guy, I like the challenge of writing and articulating thoughts, and I’m decent with insult zingers. So I metaphorically parachuted into the badlands of Twitter and Facebook, seeking to become the terror of bigots and bullies everywhere. 

    Everyone Off the Bench

    Now some might think I’ve screwed up this article by mentioning politics. “Ew, yucky!” is a summary of most common reactions. I’ve never understood that. If you don’t get involved in politics, it will get involved in you. Quite literally.

    There’s a million ways you can dissect why bad behavior seems to be on the rise, but I distill it down to this: people don’t participate enough in politics. They consider it boring and tedious. They’re partly right. It’s often designed that way to discourage people from paying attention. But participation is necessary. Just like taking out the trash and unclogging the toilet, politics may be unpleasant, but tending to the task is required and ignoring it brings disaster.

    Right now, we need everyone off the bench. Everyone has to get involved in politics. The bad guys have been working diligently to reduce our freedom for decades.

    Now they are in positions of power and using our sense of fairness against us. For example, we respect who wins the election and let them make the decisions. That grace is not returned. They don’t respect anyone else’s electoral win but their own.

    Note the differences in reaction between the presidential elections of 2016 and 2020. In 2016, the free will of the people was accepted by the losing parties. In 2020, the free will of the people has been attacked relentlessly even to this day, despite a complete lack of evidence.

    Lar’s Law of Politics and Internet Arguments, a.k.a. The “No Life Advantage“ Principle

    I don’t want to blame the average American for failure to participate. It’s not entirely our fault that we’re sliding into fascism or religious dictatorship or corporate takeover or whatever rancid dystopia-flavored smoothie results from those three heinous ideas mixed together.

    The system is already against us. We’re worked nearly to death and by the time we’re done all the annoying administrative duties of survival, we’re exhausted. We want to relax and so we ignore politics. Just how the bad guys want it.

    Exacerbating that is the “no life advantage” principle. The what? I’ll elaborate, but basically, in some fields, people who have “no life” have a built-in advantage.  

    Let’s start with you and I: we have family we love, we have hobbies, we have things we want to do, parts of life we want to experience. When we’re not pressured by work, we don’t want to get involved in politics because it’s tedious. We have a life.

    Contrast that with religious extremists, bigots, and other bad actors. As we say in the vernacular, “They have no life.” They are miserable and rather than do something to improve themselves and fix their misery, they oppress others. Religious extremists (not all people with religious belief, but extremists) are even worse. The myth of a paradise-like afterlife is a weapon the bad guys exploit: “Yes, this political work is dull, but don’t worry about it. You’ll have fun in the next life.”

    The “No Life Advantage” Principle has at least two implications:

    • In politics, those with “no life” have an advantage because they will be persistent beyond anything a person who has something fun to do can match.
    • In internet arguments, the person who has “no life” most often wins because they reply and reply until the other party goes off to do something else. The no-lifer gets the final say.

    We good guys, we live-and-let-live types, those of us with lives, have an advantage too: there are far more of us. The problem is that not enough of us are involved. We need you NOW. Everyone off the bench! If we all do a little, we win, because we so vastly outnumber the jerks. Get visible!

    With one small caveat: don’t burn out.

    Being Visible in a Way You Can Sustain

    Hold on a sec, if I’m so pro-participation, why is this article titled “Confessions” like I’m against it? Well, there’s a balance to be maintained. Participate, but don’t overdo it like I did. I’ve adjusted my Comment Commando strategy. I’ve learned to balance it with life.

    You’ve heard of “work life balance?” How about “participate-in-democracy life balance?”

    On that cruise ship, as I neglected that gorgeous view, I realized I needed to re-calibrate, or I was going to flame out and become another non-participator. You occasionally have to enjoy what you’re fighting for. And by fighting, I mean word-slappin’ user ChristAndGunLover2A with a perfect insult about his ancestry.

    Back then, I was pleased with my visibility but concerned with the time I was spending. More than that, I felt I was being manipulated by social media. It’s now common knowledge those apps serve up extreme content to keep you engaged. Was my attempt at allyship serving as support for the marginalized or more to boost a platform’s daily user metric? Was I being visible, or was I …

    • Brawling with trolls from a foreign nation bent on sowing animosity in the USA?
    • Battling with humans paid to push an agenda, to portray unpopular ideas as popular?
    • Arguing with pranksters who try to see how much they can irritate others?
    • Debating with actual extremists and/or actual idiots, neither set ever changing their minds?
    • Talking to bots from the platform itself so they can prove high “engagement” to advertisers?

    I still use social media to be visible but I’m more careful about my time there. I now have a two-comment rule. I may leave a comment if I feel the need (or urge.) If someone replies, I am allowed one counter-reply. Then I’m done.

    The sign in front of my house that marks us as visible advocates for freedom? That stays. The stickers, the flags, that all stays.

    As for visibility, it’s there now, but more a habit, and I’m always looking for new ways to do it in a more meaningful way. I hope you do too. If not, well… remember what I said about ignoring the clogged toilet.

    Imagine that on a nationwide scale. Let’s not find out what that’s like. Participate now, please. And get visible! Thank you!